An Ideal Legal System For A Digital Device - 2156 Words

An ideal legal system can be compared to a digital device. An example would be Microsoft s Windows program. When the first version of Windows emerged, people were delighted and untroubled. But as the evolution in technology expands, new versions and updates became available to as time passes. They ranged from Windows 3.0, 97, 2003, and now the newest version is Windows XP. This relates to the legal system because laws need to update to fit the time and lifestyle of the consumers, in this case the citizens of a country. Another example can be that Canada would be the IPhone 6 while France in the flip-phone, both phones but one is more likely to suit the people s needs in the revolutionized lifestyle. In 1791 the Declaration of the†¦show more content†¦Both France and the Canada have a Bill of Rights. Both documents list rights of the citizen. Both countries and the U.N. Universal Declaration of Human Rights all share one set purpose (Humphrey, 1948). They all were created in the best interest of the citizens to ensure freedom and equality throughout a nation. For over 200 years, the rights and freedoms has served as the cornerstone of the Nation s democracy for both French citizens and Canadian citizens. It has guaranteed freedom in the decision making process and equality in lives of the people. Although both Bills share same purpose, they also share small differences that make a great impact in the overview. The French Declaration of the Rights of Man s first difference from the Canadian s Charter of Rights and Freedoms is the reason to why it was created. To ensure freedom and justice to the public is the main reason for both countries but further research show The French document was written by a French assembly of representatives aimed at showing the problems of their government. The Canadian Bill of Rights was aimed at changing the government to avoid the mistakes Britain made and to keep the government in check to avoid a trampling of these rights (Goldman, 2008). Another similarity is that both documents pointed out the flaws that can cause social corruption. Beside the reason of the creation of both documents, other differences up rise knowing